The “Assumptio Non Probata,” When Tender Mercies Of The Wicked Are Cruel—Part 5 of 6
Thursday, June 17th, 2010 at 12:30 pm“Livestock Wastes Fresh Water & Corn That Could Feed Poor?”
This has been the cry of Fund for Animals, Friends of Animals, Animal Protection Institute, HSUS, PETA and others for years. They imply world hunger would be ended if no animals were raised.
But only a small percentage of grain is of #1 Grade—fit for human use. Most corn for example has fungal damage, insect damage and animal or bird defilement. We still see this in most corn cribs. Low-grade corn can be fed to animals; some can be made into fuel or other products. One thing is certain: Not enough is fit for human consumption to stop world hunger. In “hungry” places around the world, livestock is the only buffer against off seasons. Crops are grown until unfavorable weather, and then the animals are butchered as needed until crops start growing again.
A similar argument is “It takes a football field of water 6 feet deep to raise just one steer.” That’s just about an acre, and just about 5 sheep. Two years of rain, say 36 inches, will make enough grass to raise those livestock in most rich grass regions. The water falls on that acre whether the animals are there or not, so it’s a bit misleading to imply they are wasting water. In fact, most grassland isn’t fit for growing other crops—too steep, too rocky, soil too shallow, etc.—but it can grow grass. People can’t live on grass, but we can eat the sheep that graze it. So in fact, sheep make it possible for poor nations to grow more food, not less.
Moral: Always look for the activist’s unproven assumption and then follow the money.
|

